By Tim Matthews, Chief Marketing Officer at Exabeam

In the U.S and global communities, election security is a large concern because so many aspects of it can be insecure and open to attacks that may shift public opinion or be used for personal gain. Not only does the complexity of the U.S. government raise concerns about security, campaigns also have weak points that make it a target for attacks.

Limited IT Resources Put Campaigns and Voters at Risk

Given limited IT budgets, volunteers— who often work directly with voters, sometimes use their own personal devices and applications to communicate with other team members and supporters; they also have access to key private data belonging to candidates and team members. These personal devices are also used to access campaign systems such as the Voter Activation Network (NGP VAN) that include voter information to support operations such as phone banking and door-to-door canvassing. Without proper security controls, these personal devices can be used by adversaries to put both the campaign and voters at risk. Additionally, the threat of fake news has evolved with the advent of deepfake technology, which in recent times has been combined with artificial intelligence (AI), video and audio to create media that appears to be authentic— but is not.

Although security controls such as two-factor authentication (2FA) are helpful, campaigns and voters may still be at risk. Abel Morales, a security engineer at Exabeam, recommends that campaigns use user and entity behavior analysis (UEBA) to detect anomalous authentications. “By monitoring staffers’ behaviors and detecting anomalies from their typical workflows, IT would be able to reduce the impact of threats introduced through social engineering, phishing and other malicious techniques.” This method also can be used to detect voter anomalies as well.

The continuing threat of ransomware attacks and nation-state attacks

on voter databases and systems can facilitate payments in exchange for voter information. Ransomware encrypts data until a ransom is paid and could also be used to manipulate voting results or lock administrators out of critical data during an election therefore compromising voter confidence. Additionally, the increase in nation-state attacks are another major concern. Some officials believe that foreign influence on our elections will more likely come through to shape public opinion towards whatever direction serves their specific goals. In particular, the is worried that Russia will use social media to cause further division between the political parties or hack campaign websites to spread misinformation.

Does the government’s structure make election security more difficult?

The intricacies of the U.S. voting system also affect the security of elections because state and local governments are not forced to use the federal government’s testing standards. have the option to adopt these security standards, use their own, or a hybrid. Also, testing for state and local governments can be completed by private companies or local universities, as there is no single federal test certification program. This deviation from the federal standard is also seen in the lack of mandatory audits to verify the integrity of the machines and testing procedures, and the management of the voter registration database system which contains voter records. Many of these database and ill-equipped to handle today’s cybersecurity threats, making it easier for adversaries to delete or add voters. Although these differences can be detrimental to the security of elections, they make it difficult for attackers to launch a large-scale, coordinated attack.

The makeup of the voting machine market is a huge risk

Three companies make up more than 90 percent of the voting machine market, suggesting that a compromise of just one of these three companies could have a significant impact on any election.  Manipulation is not a formidable task given many of these machines are running outdated software with existing . As transitioning to machines running newer Windows operating systems in time for the 2020 election may not be possible, Microsoft has committed to providing free updates for all certified voting machines in operation running on Windows 7.

Internet-connected devices increase risk

Our U.S. voting system is comprised of many different types of devices with varying functions including tallying and reporting votes. Security experts note that web-based systems such as election-reporting websites, candidate websites and voter roll websites are easier to attack compared to a voting machine. Many of these systems are IoT devices that have their own unique security challenges. Often, they are shipped with factory-set, hardcoded passwords; they’re unable to be patched or updated; and have outdated protocols and lack encryption.  They are also susceptible to botnets that can exploit large numbers of devices in a short period. IoT attacks could also compromise a user’s browser to manipulate votes and cut power to .

Proactive responses to help understaffed election IT teams

To prevent targeted attacks, campaign IT tech teams and staffers are performing training courses to learn how to detect and report suspicious emails. The DNC has created a for campaigns with recommendations, and the Center for Internet Security has also developed a library of resources to help campaigns including a .  Machine-based learning systems enable limited teams to operate 50 percent more efficiently through automation – which is essential given the scale and number of elections. Security orchestration, automation, and response (SOAR) as part of a modern SIEM can also orchestrate remediation in response to an identified anomaly through playbooks.  SOAR automatically identifies and prioritizes cybersecurity risks and responds to low-level security events, which is extremely useful for state and local government agencies that operate with small cybersecurity teams.

Republicans and Democrats unite to offer a helping hand

In late 2019, recognizing the seriousness of election attacks and the lack of security resources, former campaign managers for Hillary Clinton and Mitt Romney launched a non-profit organization, , which offers free to low-cost security technology and services to federal election campaigns. Some experts predict that the 2020 election will be one of the most anticipated digital security events in U.S. history. Given the complexity of the election process and voting system, security automation, behavior analytics and security education can be a part of the solution for managing a secure voting process.






Source link

Write a comment:
*

Your email address will not be published.